![]() ![]() |
| Dec. 1, 2004 What's Next? Pay Toilets? So when you wake up in the morning, look yourself in the mirror, and ask the question, "Why does the Tribune dislike me so much?" After all, you go to work, put in your 40 hours - probably more - contribute to one of the country's great newspapers, help make it an economic enterprise that rakes in huge profits. What's not to like? Now the Tribune types would say that I have misrepresented their feelings, that employees like you - as the cover of one of their recent house publications said - are the company's most important asset. But how can you tell? A couple of years ago, when non-union Sun employees were forced to take a one-year pay freeze, Tribune eased the burden. These managers all got free parking - essentially a $13 a week raise - and many got stock options and today, while eligible for raises, they still get free parking. When the Guild signed its contract last year, we had to endure that same one-year pay freeze. What did we get? Replacement trainees and a regressive contract that only made the blow harsher. This year, we did get a raise, but we have to absorb higher medical care costs. And now, on top of that, instead of free parking, the company is demanding that we pay $5 more per week for using its garage. They are making sure you take home as little of that raise as possible, essentially trying to give you a second year of a pay freeze. We have been negotiating with the company over the parking raise. It really is outrageous. Remember that the highest paid people in the company - including your supervisor - pay nothing to park. So if the company's costs are going up, wouldn't it make sense to take $5 a week from those people instead of the lower paid people? Doesn't the fact that they are demanding more money from you make it sound like they don't like you very much? Interestingly, in the talks with the Guild, company negotiators don't claim that their costs are going up. They refuse to say anything about why they want another $5 out of you (though they did reduce it to $3.50 for those making under $25,000 a year - 22 of whom now use the lot). They argue they hadn't raised it in a long time, so why not? What this basically means is that you are not their friend, you are a revenue source. They want to charge you more for coming to work because ... well, because they can. As one friend in the newsroom said, "What's next? Pay toilets?" If so, there would probably be separate, free bathrooms for managers. In the negotiations, we were told that we shouldn't worry about the parking increase because, "It's only a dollar a day. People pay more than that getting a cup of coffee at Nina's every day." Geez, I'm sure that makes you feel better, to know that almost 20 percent of your raise is not really very much money. But maybe you should ask your boss, the one getting free parking, for a dollar every day to cover your increase. Hey, tell her you heard it's not that much money. But wait, there's more. We tried to lessen the blow of the parking increase by asking management to let us participate in a federal program that lets you pay your commuting costs - whether bus, train or parking - out of pre-tax money. Currently, you have this privilege only if you park in the company lot. (We incorrectly indicated otherwise in a previous bulletin. That was an error.) Not only would you benefit, but the company would, too, as it would not have to pay its share of your Social Security tax on that money. You would think if they liked you, the Tribune types would eagerly offer you this benefit. Think again. They brought it up a couple of years ago and said to the Guild, "What will you give up for this?" Nothing, we said. End of discussion. This time, in return for allowing us to participate in a program that would save the company money, they want us to agree to allow them to raise parking for Guild members yearly by the same percentage that the price for the public goes up. That doesn't sound like someone who likes you very much, does it? But don't take it personally. Its not that the Tribune doesn't like you, it's that they don't like the Union and they think if they treat Union members badly, it's a way to get back at the Union (what they fail to realize is that we are the Union). Never mind what it does to morale and loyalty and all those things that good managers are supposed to cherish, they want to punish you for that. Of
course, every time they do that, it just reminds you why you need
a union. So don't worry what the Tribune thinks of you. The Guild
likes you. And we're going to be around for a long, long time. --
Michael Hill, Unit Chair Nickel-and-Diming Back Tribune
is reaching into our pockets, for higher health premium share and
co-pays and, now, for higher parking rates. The following should be indicated on the time sheet.
The following require filing an expense form to get reimbursement.
It's Your Overtime, You Earned It! Speaking of collecting what we're entitled to, do not forget to put in for your overtime pay for extra time (over forty hours) that you work during the workweek.
Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act requires an employer to
pay overtime to employees who work more than 40 hours per week unless
the employee qualifies under an exemption to the maximum hour provisions.
In our collective bargaining agreement employees earn one and one-half (1 ½) times their hourly rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty (40) hours during the workweek. Make sure you record your hours properly and accurately so you can get credit for all of your overtime. Sun management is responsible for keeping these records but in case of a dispute, you should always keep a record for yourself. If your supervisor tries to discourage you from properly recording your overtime contact the Guild or the local Wage and Hour office located 103 South Gay Street, Baltimore, MD or call 1-866-4-USWAGE (1-866-487-9243). Some of your time away from work counts toward your 40 hours for computing overtime. Remember:
Not all jobs titles are eligible for overtime. Exclusions for overtime are listed in Section 6.5 in the contract.
Sun Management Effectuates More Layoffs During Holidays The Sun management has just effectuated layoffs again. It seems like Sun management always likes to do layoffs right around the holidays. The layoff is dealing with one Advertising Service Clerk in the PrePress and Business Development Department and will be effective on January 15, 2005.
Last year during the holidays the Sun laid off several employees only
to find, after the Guild challenged it, that the lay off had been done
incorrectly. The Sun had to recall many of employees originally laid
off. Well, this year management is back at it and the Guild will make
sure management follows the contract correctly again. Grievances/Issues in the Pipeline Right now the Guild is engaged in several legal battles with the company. Although this litigation impacts us locally, it's the Tribune in Chicago calling the shots. The Tribune lawyers from Chicago are guiding the Sun Labor Relations legal maneuvers to compromise the Guild and their own employees. Here are some updates: PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLANS The Guild filed an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) against the Sun because the Sun did not properly bargain the Performance Improvement Plan during evaluation bargaining earlier this year. Some employees have received Performance Improvement Plans from management, in an attempt to correct or enhance employee's production through trepidation. Because of Sun's Labor Relations Department missteps, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a charge against the Sun for failing to bargain in good faith and for not proving information regarding the Performance Improvement Plans. The leverage of the NLRB charge forced the Sun to settle this issue with the Guild. Sun management must realize that they have to deal with the Guild and cannot implement anything they like. Below is the joint statement settlement: JOINT STATEMENT BY THE BALTIMORE SUN AND THE WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE NEWSPAPER GUILD On March 31, 2004, the Guild filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board Claiming that the Sun failed to bargain in good faith over the use of Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) in connection with the negotiations of a performance evaluation system. The Sun denies the charge. Both parties now agree to resolve the litigation before the Board with the following Letter of Understanding: The Publisher shall have the right, from time to time, to design and/or implement written Performance Improvement Plan ("PIP") forms in departments covered by this Agreement. The Publisher will notify the Union of any such proposed written forms and give the Guild the opportunity to bargain over the design of such PIP forms following the execution of this letter or upon future notice of the design of such form. Upon the Guild's request on or before January 14, 2005, the parties agree to bargain in good faith for four (4) weeks. If, following such a request from the Guild, the Publisher is unable to schedule any bargaining during a particular week within the relevant four-week period, the bargaining period will be extended by an equal number of weeks. In the event the parties are unable to reach agreement over the design of PIP forms within the time defined by this Letter of Understanding, the Publisher may continue to use any existing forms or implement new written forms consistent with its last offer to the Guild. On or before December 31, 2004, the Guild may request, on a one-time basis, that The Sun rescind any PIP form issued to unit employees between the date of January 1, 2004 and the date on which the parties conclude the PIP form negotiations within the time period described above. Upon such timely request to rescind PIP forms, the Sun agrees to transfer the content of the applicable PIP form into a written memorandum (the "PIP Memorandum") to be placed in the employee's personnel file, and then rescind the related PIP form. The PIP Memorandum will be fully enforceable provided its content is consistent with the content of the related PIP form that it has replaced. RETIREE MEDICAL HEALTH PLAN The company met with the Guild on October 28 for the step three grievance regarding its elimination of access to the health plan for employees retiring after August 31, 2004. The Guild demonstrated that the company repeatedly stated in bargaining that its proposal to end access to the plan for employees hired after June 25, 2003 would have no effect on employees hired before June 25, 2003. Still, the company denied the grievance and the Guild will take necessary actions to compel arbitration so the benefit is preserved as the contract intends. ETHICS CODE BARGAINING Also on October 5, 2004 the Guild filed an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) against the Sun over the recent ethics bargaining. In the ULP we claimed that the ethics code interferes with and restrains, and is inherently destructive of bargaining unit employees' Section 7 rights (right to engage in protected union activity), and subjects employees to discipline for engaging in activities protected by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. There are also other issues with the code, such as:
JANITORAL EVALUATIONS We filed another Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) last week with the National Labor Relations Board against the Sun. Sun management has failed to bargain in good faith over a new Janitorial Evaluation System. Even though we bargained with the Sun earlier this year over evaluations, management insisted on implementing another separate evaluation system for the Janitorial Department at Sun Park. This is in addition to the one for all employees, now janitorial employees have two evaluations.
We hope to have the NLRB issue a charge on this matter and rescind the
extra janitorial evaluation until properly bargained.
Return to Guild Local Home Page
Washington-Baltimore
Newspaper Guild, Local 32035 TNG-CWA, AFL-CIO/
1100 15th St., NW, Suite 350, Washington,
D.C. 20005
202-785-3650 /Fax: 202-785-3659 © 2004 Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild. No portion of this website may be reproduced in any form without expressed written permission, except by members of the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild. Copyright of photographs is held by the photographers; reprint permission may be granted only by the photographers. WBNG is solely responsible for the content of this website. Questions or comments about this site? Contact Local32035@wbng.org |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||